How an insightful interview process helped Laura Jackson, uncover each candidate’s hidden skills and form a powerful partnership
Disclaimer: This is a work of fiction. Any names or characters, businesses or places, events, or incidents are fictitious. Any resemblance to actual persons, living or dead, or actual events is purely coincidental.
Laura sighed heavily as she gazed out the vast windows of her tenth-floor office.
The bustling city below appeared like a complex machine, with tiny vehicles and people zipping between gleaming skyscrapers in an intricate dance.
Somewhere down there among the anonymous masses were the key parts she needed to complete her new team—if only she could discern the right matches.
The weight of responsibility settled on Laura’s shoulders.
This assignment was her chance to prove herself as a manager after the disastrous fallout from her last job.
She was determined not to repeat past failures through hasty decisions made without truly understanding the human elements involved.
But people were far more intricate than technical specifications on paper.
How could she possibly gauge someone’s true character and potential from a single interview?
Laura spun idly in her luxury chair, hands clasped behind her head, contemplating potential strategies.
Her usual methodical approach seemed unlikely to reveal the nuances that really mattered.
But what other option was there with such a short timeline to fill four crucial roles?
As her gaze returned to the lively metropolis vista, an idea began to take shape.
What if, instead of viewing each candidate in isolation, she focused on how their unique qualities intersected and complemented one another as a unified group?
If she could discern their individual strengths and weaknesses, then explore creative ways to balance and enhance those traits through strategic partnerships, perhaps a synergistic dynamic could emerge.
After all, together, an assembly of disparate parts had the potential to accomplish so much more than any single entity alone.
Their variances held promise as an asset, not a hindrance, if properly combined and channelled towards collaborative goals.
With this fresh lens, Laura felt newly energized to begin the process of discovery.
A Creative Spark
Laura’s schedule that afternoon was packed with interviews, so she dove right in with her first appointment—a soft-spoken young man named Frank who worked as a front-end developer.
His résumé listed not only a computer science degree but also extensive experience with digital art programmes.
Curious to expose this hidden talent, Laura steered their discussion in that direction.
At first, Frank seemed shy and reserved when answering questions. But when asked about his artistic background, a subtle transformation overtook him.
His normally lowered gaze lifted, eyes shining with passion as he enthusiastically described past projects that blended coding with design.
One had involved coding animation loops within a digital painting to mesmerising effect.
Laura was impressed not only by Frank’s technical programming skills, evident in his current role, but the creative artistic eye she sensed lurking beneath his quiet exterior.
Someone with both logic and aesthetic sensibilities could help shape an engaging user experience beyond sterile functionality.
More importantly, she got the feeling that Frank simply needed an encouraging environment where his unique blend of talents felt valued and could truly shine.
As their hour concluded, Laura thanked Frank warmly and saw a small, appreciative smile cross his lips in return — a gesture that told her all she needed to know about his potential if properly motivated.
She made a mental note to consider how Frank’s contributions might uplift others.
Energised by Change
In contrast to Frank’s reserved manner, the next candidate bursting through Laura’s door was a whirlwind of constant motion and abundant chatter — seasoned marketer Emily Jones.
Where Frank maintained a low, measured tone, Emily spoke rapidly and excitably with grand gestures.
She flung herself into a chair across from Laura’s desk, long legs bouncing, and launched immediately into boasting of past successes launching products on impossible timelines.
It quickly became evident that Emily thrived in high-pressure situations demanding rapid iteration based on shifting variables.
The woman radiated boundless energy, as if electrically charged, giving the impression she’d wither without constant stimulation and change.
“Boring jobs holding my focus for long just aren’t an option,” Emily declared bluntly when asked about potential weaknesses.
“I need constant excitement and busywork churning to stay invested.”
Laura was impressed with Emily’s ability to manage chaos while still achieving results, but she questioned whether such a brisk, disruptive personality wouldn’t exhaust more methodical teammates.
This candidate’s strengths would require a particularly thoughtful pairing with a counter-balancing temperament who could ground her whirlwind tendencies productively.
Still, Emily’s skill at adapting on the fly presented intriguing possibilities if properly directed.
A Meticulous Method
In stark contrast to the previous fiery interviews, Jonathan Smith approached their meeting with quiet, painstaking care.
Where Emily had barely settled into her seat before overflowing with opinions and antics, Jonathan took several minutes arranging a small notebook and pen precisely parallel to the edge before finally greeting Laura.
Then he proceeded to describe tiny optimisations he’d implemented to manufacturing processes at his last electronics firm with such intricate detail that it seemed he’d diagrammed each component on a microscopic level.
It quickly became evident that Jonathan derived immense satisfaction from delving into complex systems to uncover even the subtlest inefficiencies, like a detective on the hunt.
While his dedication to thorough, methodical problem-solving would benefit any team in quality control, Laura noted his hyper-focus on minutiae carried the risk of slowing rapid changes needed to meet tight deadlines.
The challenge would be carving a role for Jonathan that tapped his patience while still facilitating forward progress.
As their hour concluded and Jonathan meticulously repacked his belongings with almost surgical care, Laura reflected on how his steadiness could balance others’ fluctuations—if properly guided towards productivity rather than stagnation in unnecessary subtleties.
A part slowly fell into place.
Disruption for Good
In sharp contrast to the previous buttoned-up interview, Chris Wilson was an unruly hurricane of boisterous opinions and off-topic tangents from the moment he flung himself casually into Laura’s office.
Within minutes, they’d debated everything from company ethics to favourite films, with Chris injecting disruptive ideas at a dizzying pace. When asked about weaknesses, he didn’t mince words:
“Rules are more like loose guidelines if something better comes along in my mind.”
Still, beneath Chris’s chaotic exterior burned a passion for innovation that Laura sensed could push boundaries, not break them, if channelled constructively.
She let the conversation ride wherever Chris’s mind took it, listening closely for the possibilities amidst seeming chaos.
Over time, structure and purpose emerged in the madness as Chris eagerly brainstormed ideas for whole new product lines with profound implications.
Where others saw disorder, Laura admired Chris’s lack of limitation—the raw potential for disruption that could revolutionise if properly refined.
All Chris needed was a nurturing environment where outside-the-box thinking felt not only accepted but encouraged to blossom further.
A vision began forming of how Chris’s unorthodox approaches could uplift others with more conventional strengths in balanced synergy.
The Puzzle Pieces Align
As Laura’s last meeting ended and Chris exited with a boisterous yell of farewell that surely disturbed nearby cubicles, she leant back, exhausted yet brimming with new insights.
Her schedule was finally clear after many hours interviewing an assortment of candidates that ranged from quiet introvert to vivacious extrovert.
She poured over collected notes, analysing each personality’s profile now with a fresher lens:
- Frank’s creative talents and meticulous eye for aesthetically-pleasing design
- Emily’s rapid iteration skills and ability to adapt productively amidst constant fluctuation
- Jonathan’s dedicated problem-solving work ethic and patience with nitty gritty details
- Chris’s disruptive innovations, bursting with raw potential, are given opportunity to blossom
Individually, she saw strengths—but also risks if left to extremes.
However, when viewing them as an ensemble cast with room for enhancement through cooperation, Laura began to sense exciting possibilities.
If paired thoughtfully and playing to diverse skillsets, these contrasting personalities seemed poised to achieve outcomes greater than any on their own through balanced exchange.
The puzzle pieces were aligning, but crucial questions lingered: How could she shape collaborative duties to extract each member’s contributions productively?
What partnerships would allow diverse assets to flow together smoothly while maximising inherent talents?
And ultimately, which candidates should receive offers to complete this uniquely gifted team?
Laura grinned with newfound optimism.
For now, she felt certain the right dynamic existed somewhere within these diverse candidates.
It was up to her experiential wisdom to unite disparate parts into a cohesive, thriving whole.
Thanks for reading…
If you enjoyed reading my story, please highlight any parts you think other readers would find interesting.
Don’t forget to leave your comments about what you thought of this story.
Consider following me here on Medium and subscribing to my stories.
nom@d learning 
Leave a comment